{"id":"W2184708628","doi":"","title":"Sedimentary thickness from Receiver Function analysis - a simple approach. Case study from North Greenland.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EGUGA","topic":"Geological Studies and Exploration","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology; Structural basin; Sedimentary rock; Sedimentary basin; Submarine pipeline; Proterozoic; Receiver function; Sedimentary basin analysis; Canada Basin; Sedimentary structures; Geomorphology; Seismology; Paleontology; Oceanography; Sedimentary depositional environment; Lithosphere; Tectonics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006815841,0.0008071508,0.000247343,0.001338882,0.0003242837,0.0006747176,0.0006708362,0.000665815,0.001169498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001137316,0.0002434614,0.0004913192,0.001649366,0.0005086508,0.0005673646,0.0006163336,0.0002864297,0.0001999551],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001718698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005632009,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1133807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2635765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997995,0.0000757233,0.0000121123,0.00002970213,0.00005758681,0.00002537013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996556,0.0001610462,0.00006203457,0.00004208519,0.00006407417,0.00001506461],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004525421,0.0003336499,0.4673555,0.0006038804,0.0005281222,0.0222469,0.002066727,0.2872207,0.01718488,0.01133269,0.003359286,0.1873151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007726621,0.0005630986,0.6530365,0.0002731963,0.0005425098,0.005956392,0.003656033,0.3058652,0.009029844,0.007005817,0.01386373,0.0001303859],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9610691,0.0009966129,0.02587201,0.0002775225,0.00001960938,0.0001052456,0.001056999,0.000126336,0.01047658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808124,0.0003658237,0.01562422,0.00002717111,0.000006408802,0.00002153938,0.0003102184,0.00002153359,0.0028106],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1133807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2254416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03748628749834407,"score_gpt":0.216938677968858,"score_spread":0.1794523904705139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}