{"id":"W2184884018","doi":"10.3233/ifs-141336","title":"Coalition fuzzy stability analysis in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Stability (learning theory); Preference; Generalization; Computer science; Fuzzy set operations; Conflict resolution; Fuzzy number; Mathematical optimization; Defuzzification; Mathematics; Fuzzy set; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001555551,0.0006036964,0.0006535529,0.001541748,0.0007570371,0.001492645,0.001104808,0.0007733687,0.003087974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003244997,0.0001957715,0.0009166207,0.001251064,0.001543202,0.00173466,0.001180347,0.0008676164,0.000246744],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002060598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001131311,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008872198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006121229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992909,0.0003782636,0.00001949003,0.00009361398,0.0001535015,0.00006407608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988675,0.0006653977,0.0001474899,0.00005638538,0.0001863276,0.00007689245],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003301472,0.0000181428,0.0003393434,0.0000347583,0.00003650916,0.0001101726,0.0001193663,0.5183836,0.0007463337,0.4739152,0.0008056673,0.005457928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003796906,0.000007155211,0.0000575976,0.000004208435,0.000004655675,0.0000106604,0.00003259722,0.8784682,0.00007166928,0.1209389,0.0003949649,0.000005481823],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05738522,0.0003021861,0.9299697,0.0004565812,0.00003674081,0.00004892951,0.0001049875,0.00006669368,0.01162898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9458209,0.0002981602,0.04910607,0.00006556496,0.00003491779,0.0001013167,0.00009067876,0.00003231269,0.00445006],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008872198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01764113,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4674878561186124,"score_gpt":0.458149252828932,"score_spread":0.009338603289680447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}