{"id":"W2185923048","doi":"10.5751/es-00438-060211","title":"Cost-effective Sampling Design Applied to Large-scale Monitoring of Boreal Birds","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sampling (signal processing); Sampling design; Statistical power; Sample (material); Sample size determination; Scale (ratio); Environmental science; Boreal; Ecology; Statistics; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Mathematics; Geography; Biology; Cartography; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003021996,0.00008880601,0.000167,0.00005150136,0.0001800571,0.000004232811,0.0001008039,0.00009270368,0.0004294591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000129085,0.00009471864,0.00002307564,0.0002213523,0.0001129276,0.00006585902,0.00009343516,0.00008032461,0.0002969859],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001213828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004848023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002121495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003999135,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999218,0.000072493,0.0002048981,0.0002116269,0.00007218724,0.0002207982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993253,0.0003902685,0.00009909649,0.000112192,0.00002614628,0.00004694244],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002130709,0.00008508679,0.9812419,0.000004716322,0.00001755158,6.904071e-7,0.001476958,0.01202903,0.001559628,0.0003503736,0.0007701307,0.002442672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003509065,0.0001005702,0.9845961,0.000002777571,0.00001219172,0.000001126624,0.000244017,0.01232941,0.0007895221,0.0005044378,0.0009787444,0.00009014737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.904341,0.00001206374,0.08989272,0.0006990881,0.0002568172,0.001053016,0.000004942046,0.00004428209,0.003696038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799553,0.00001387088,0.018677,0.0006257148,0.00001830289,0.0004990625,0.000003095214,0.000008247183,0.0001994698],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0756142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4702276,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05067868490700226,"score_gpt":0.2827260432616013,"score_spread":0.232047358354599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}