{"id":"W2185959677","doi":"","title":"Illustration and taxonomic reevaluation of Neogene Foraminifera described from Japan","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"reroDoc Digital Library","topic":"Geology and Paleoclimatology Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Taxonomy (biology); Neogene; Taxon; Paleontology; Foraminifera; Focus (optics); Geology; Geography; Biology; Zoology; Optics; Oceanography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008249931,0.0000838341,0.000142101,0.00006487552,0.00005374231,0.00007968075,0.0001085585,0.00009416506,0.0006396681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000392281,0.00007377262,0.00002807129,0.00009556111,0.000114878,0.001201593,0.00001044155,0.00008410233,0.0001019502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":3.290943e-7,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004522115,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002540276,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992993,0.00005702096,0.00019099,0.0001911425,0.0000982791,0.0001632473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995632,0.0001589875,0.00006165326,0.0001270519,0.00001178881,0.00007729584],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009405959,0.00001195887,0.9642269,0.000004021151,0.000008750348,0.000003540332,0.0000298849,0.00003933335,0.00002508597,0.0001988665,0.0002351571,0.03512244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002165705,0.000254751,0.9893551,0.00001003364,0.000006308492,0.00001464618,0.00003957205,0.001389454,0.0005549364,0.007539677,0.0005389989,0.00007994056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9768795,0.0005562099,0.00001810201,0.0006788172,0.0000435842,0.0001269936,0.0002094949,0.00003148359,0.02145587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973961,0.0000641222,0.0006133101,0.0001293232,0.00004386949,4.03353e-7,0.001532054,0.000001782108,0.000219018],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03504249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7003918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02829929575766104,"score_gpt":0.2121838003059222,"score_spread":0.1838845045482611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}