{"id":"W2186796023","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2005.040","title":"Performance of White Sucker Populations along the Saint John River Main Stem, New Brunswick, Canada: An Example of Effects-Based Cumulative Effects Assessment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Golder Associates (Canada)","funders":"Canadian Water Network; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Catostomus; Sucker; Ecology; Habitat; Environmental science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; SAINT; Dam removal; Hydrology (agriculture); Geography; Fishery; Biology; Sediment; Geology; Zoology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005571879,0.0001374237,0.0002618967,0.0000818737,0.0009609804,0.00002393914,0.0004055928,0.00004869409,0.0004478524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005203168,0.00008259001,0.0000718038,0.000195331,0.0005105787,0.0003337819,0.0004047638,0.0004921466,0.00001417305],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009481604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003843487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5784277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8730064,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958495,0.001791622,0.0004725973,0.0002304301,0.001102561,0.0005532918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988242,0.0004568929,0.0001558001,0.0003321535,0.0000690957,0.0001618646],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008178947,0.0001540309,0.9573113,0.0001053257,0.00008355563,0.000008908909,0.002650539,0.03205433,0.0003302755,0.0004645766,0.005719105,0.001036242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006806162,0.0003266614,0.9887642,0.00004631242,0.00002394003,0.000002904519,0.0002235223,0.005811589,0.002102967,0.0002039583,0.001708192,0.0001051436],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945095,0.00001809478,0.0008884523,0.003463312,0.00008652776,0.0004946223,0.000002298689,0.000005578623,0.000531626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968957,0.00001329132,0.001602598,0.0002337848,0.00006012826,0.000009754887,0.000005514661,0.000009406976,0.001169811],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2945788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7391182,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0920294329403757,"score_gpt":0.3611744745325247,"score_spread":0.269145041592149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}