{"id":"W2187780561","doi":"10.5194/acp-16-2435-2016","title":"Evaluation and application of multi-decadal visibility data for trend analysis of atmospheric haze","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atmospheric chemistry and physics","topic":"Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Dalhousie University","funders":"Argonne National Laboratory; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Goddard Institute for Space Studies; National Park Service; University of California, Davis; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Killam Trusts; National Centers for Environmental Information; Desert Research Institute; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Haze; Environmental science; Visibility; Aerosol; Climatology; Meteorology; Atmospheric research; Atmospheric sciences; Trend analysis; Geography; Statistics; Geology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004322574,0.0004439739,0.0003525967,0.003149561,0.0002445933,0.00113738,0.0004567955,0.0003549175,0.0005388853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007302204,0.0002565073,0.0007496136,0.001862745,0.0001050411,0.0008290293,0.00100765,0.0004357143,0.0001437554],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004970346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000706207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01338494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01661178,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991556,0.0002689802,0.00007845243,0.000205423,0.0002211276,0.0000702751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969478,0.0009877027,0.0004186656,0.0003947821,0.001067948,0.0001830376],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004806002,0.0005191583,0.6590773,0.0001938803,0.00068878,0.0001687303,0.0004358322,0.06448085,0.01310162,0.001396376,0.002148315,0.2573085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005799604,0.0003354699,0.5395042,0.00003873884,0.0001753364,0.00006344364,0.0003957828,0.4507729,0.005163618,0.0006221863,0.002820707,0.00004961857],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9510506,0.0002950352,0.04300185,0.0001314193,0.00005026206,0.0001206961,0.003507282,0.0007341139,0.00110875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9512337,0.000106855,0.04366052,0.00001694534,0.00001711413,0.00007129072,0.004542541,0.00007861778,0.0002723884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01338494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02661407,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0259315994103122,"score_gpt":0.2780462251274022,"score_spread":0.25211462571709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}