{"id":"W2188200520","doi":"10.5539/ijel.v5n6p66","title":"A Study on the Use of Lexical Chunks by Chinese EFL Learners in Writing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of English Linguistics","topic":"Second Language Acquisition and Learning","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department of Education of Zhejiang Province; St. John's University; Zhejiang Gongshang University","keywords":"Linguistics; English as a foreign language; Test (biology); Lexical item; Psychology; Computer science; Lexical choice; China; Chinese as a foreign language; Mathematics education; Natural language processing; History; Philosophy; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009156167,0.00009352341,0.0001739696,0.0001826954,0.00001706204,0.00005554131,0.0003283561,0.00005691088,0.0008014497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07584142,0.00006586366,0.00007120091,0.0001118965,0.0000449565,0.00003828748,0.00003720239,0.0005584182,0.000009106265],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005619934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004186427,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004542807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004438281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985102,0.0002557185,0.0005530983,0.0000990658,0.0004678705,0.0001140805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994754,0.0008806178,0.000370487,0.000124843,0.003799237,0.00007087419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003346068,0.006760798,0.5034864,0.00001122548,0.0016171,0.003624937,0.2363561,0.008811702,0.00009975873,0.03391623,0.1959888,0.005980826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01593786,0.003548085,0.1375865,0.0004152864,0.0001270452,0.0000875362,0.3022747,0.0007003424,0.0001439844,0.000988675,0.5374711,0.0007188704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9709579,0.0002176913,0.00005638471,0.00008633062,0.006012387,0.00007065422,0.0000110108,0.000008784348,0.02257884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946656,0.000001679544,0.0001109822,0.001273475,0.003760953,0.000001617823,0.000004940609,0.00001325723,0.0001674657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9319432,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07532691951115136,"score_gpt":0.3827063190201167,"score_spread":0.3073793995089653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}