{"id":"W2188824898","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.0020.004","title":"Two Decades of the <i>Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation</i> : A Content Analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Milestone; Editorial board; Content analysis; Library science; Descriptive statistics; History; Sociology; Social science; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0320583,0.0004131723,0.0008837411,0.02771965,0.008792662,0.01414311,0.001279009,0.0009173305,0.004798028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08794782,0.0005322447,0.0005249112,0.04212042,0.00437531,0.004185707,0.002944038,0.001806715,0.000454001],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02947086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1048679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1694099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3066968,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9734696,0.003813983,0.002310803,0.001076933,0.01799537,0.001333391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8028624,0.04202582,0.01364351,0.003764428,0.1292677,0.008436088],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005482987,0.0003931437,0.1406094,0.0060675,0.0002842878,0.0007959411,0.1168526,0.0002571424,0.003313867,0.0396344,0.1866583,0.504585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000409087,0.000266156,0.3851862,0.007554295,0.0002928992,0.0004493734,0.1076562,0.0005783622,0.002477232,0.003139964,0.4922016,0.0001568095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6145318,0.09237478,0.008656415,0.1111884,0.01200891,0.002413821,0.01085375,0.0003308959,0.1476413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8978544,0.04266466,0.01647293,0.008653469,0.002869984,0.00193194,0.004025506,0.0003306083,0.02519648],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9722803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3368477,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4354897721352746,"score_gpt":0.5284019432527968,"score_spread":0.0929121711175222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}