{"id":"W2189116695","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1139444","title":"Classical, Singular, and Impulse Stochastic Control for the Optimal Dividend Policy when There is Regime Switching","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Stochastic processes and financial applications","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Impulse control; Dividend; Impulse (physics); Dividend policy; Control theory (sociology); Economics; Stochastic control; Optimal control; Control (management); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Physics; Psychology; Finance; Classical mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006926935,0.001771004,0.003439965,0.00230685,0.001145957,0.004491247,0.002294657,0.004528367,0.005898501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02432596,0.00168256,0.002167527,0.001161639,0.006420253,0.004254539,0.002577072,0.004116643,0.0003178571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004327576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004604731,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00873333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981452,0.0006734669,0.0001040767,0.0003990882,0.0003139936,0.0003641429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875841,0.00861227,0.001289991,0.0004274395,0.001028572,0.001057714],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002800618,0.0001412485,0.001257314,0.000226983,0.0002620482,0.0003686545,0.0002252633,0.4405704,0.001867656,0.5469861,0.002111917,0.005702275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003522701,0.00002407443,0.0004338773,0.00001912009,0.00003230563,0.00002640649,0.00002937671,0.883275,0.0001178701,0.115828,0.0001390744,0.00003962066],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2968308,0.003816266,0.6668012,0.01052285,0.0008614965,0.0001218363,0.0005261246,0.0004333278,0.02008603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750333,0.001115933,0.01210019,0.0004099906,0.0006038028,0.0001056688,0.0001682205,0.00009728707,0.01036566],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03663361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01774214296641926,"score_gpt":0.2329316647322519,"score_spread":0.2151895217658326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}