{"id":"W2189458455","doi":"10.1515/sg-2006-0011","title":"Accuracy of Ranking Individuals in Field Tests of Different Designs: A Computer Simulation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Silvae genetica/Silvae Genetica","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Plant Biotechnology Institute; Government of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Heritability; Statistics; Ranking (information retrieval); Trait; Tree (set theory); Biology; Mathematics; Population; Variance (accounting); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Evolutionary biology; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003168047,0.0002580671,0.0003853001,0.0001564064,0.00006489015,0.00001660717,0.0004323717,0.000177453,0.001045031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008534497,0.0002459672,0.0001049668,0.0003252492,0.0002834745,0.0000701992,0.0004257815,0.0001391284,0.00008824212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006322361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001738192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002860871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009662859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977015,0.0001686566,0.0007672178,0.0004735728,0.0004186441,0.000470379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985316,0.0005890283,0.0002914239,0.0004950864,0.00002140178,0.00007150848],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005243457,0.0005598693,0.6673948,0.0000588021,0.00003592207,0.000007750531,0.0002316992,0.2975211,0.01249104,0.001725916,0.0004446386,0.01947606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008637737,0.0004060953,0.9507271,0.00004547171,0.00004835281,0.000001107418,0.00001652546,0.01296994,0.02042261,0.0138457,0.0004046269,0.0002487183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9782766,0.0002306785,0.01744775,0.0001541405,0.0001396987,0.0007280327,0.000006605868,0.00002461815,0.002991861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876987,0.00005170162,0.01187239,0.0001946481,0.00005157704,0.00004150891,0.00001261714,0.00002139756,0.00005548606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2845511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01204265095730547,"score_gpt":0.2474918962189876,"score_spread":0.2354492452616821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}