{"id":"W2189472937","doi":"10.20506/rst.31.1.2116","title":"Quantitative human health risk assessments of antimicrobial use in animals and selection of resistance: a review of publicly available reports","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Revue Scientifique et Technique de l OIE","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Antimicrobial; Risk assessment; Scrutiny; Selection (genetic algorithm); Antibiotic resistance; Human health; Risk analysis (engineering); Biotechnology; Environmental health; Biology; Medicine; Computer science; Antibiotics; Microbiology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006931875,0.0003107149,0.00153128,0.0002268645,0.00006718506,0.00002402641,0.0002414695,0.0002051848,0.0003007016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003321216,0.0002836069,0.0002216335,0.001040432,0.0004926189,0.0004197359,0.000302108,0.0004756285,0.00000539435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004236833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001537196,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008107056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004713113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960559,0.001005148,0.001530916,0.0006310659,0.0003410229,0.0004359505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967714,0.0001592669,0.002462431,0.0003904153,0.00003049174,0.0001860084],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002674389,0.001503001,0.02435745,0.8636885,0.0001083083,0.00003573173,0.0002136853,0.000002559588,0.06152156,0.0004587754,0.007918276,0.04016542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002917588,0.0003576976,0.005953064,0.710987,0.0006744359,0.0003013827,0.00001230891,0.00001029,0.02663469,0.0003331987,0.2535142,0.0009300423],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00530714,0.9888443,0.0005752437,0.00006599943,0.0000677464,0.003455916,0.0002832048,0.00003198874,0.001368506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003769883,0.9809514,0.0146521,0.00005584866,0.000006388494,0.00004342122,0.00004226394,0.0000332316,0.0004455005],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2455959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999616,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1338108562440279,"score_gpt":0.41676141375275,"score_spread":0.2829505575087221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}