{"id":"W2189472937","doi":"10.20506/rst.31.1.2116","title":"Quantitative human health risk assessments of antimicrobial use in animals and selection of resistance: a review of publicly available reports","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Revue Scientifique et Technique de l OIE","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Antimicrobial; Risk assessment; Scrutiny; Selection (genetic algorithm); Antibiotic resistance; Human health; Risk analysis (engineering); Biotechnology; Environmental health; Biology; Medicine; Computer science; Antibiotics; Microbiology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007735479,0.001361684,0.002659992,0.008145239,0.0002593498,0.001787116,0.001557308,0.001472148,0.003033875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01464019,0.0006224734,0.002044193,0.008453341,0.0008364636,0.002073357,0.0008294327,0.0009806728,0.0006711144],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001789909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005050111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004668336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005061751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959,0.001187738,0.0007749114,0.0003963734,0.001655211,0.00008579234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762126,0.0170797,0.003303043,0.0003225803,0.002959005,0.0001231342],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001251964,0.00006167507,0.001376331,0.157959,0.001141614,0.0001544717,0.0001833033,0.001460075,0.0008048884,0.003610526,0.01934404,0.8137789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004278189,0.0003397353,0.01097165,0.1612664,0.004875877,0.001396144,0.0006793436,0.0007114118,0.002978337,0.006858635,0.8097283,0.0001514853],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002273054,0.997736,0.0005165383,0.0004683379,0.00008328837,0.00002083047,0.0002438838,0.000007562595,0.0006963382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002333757,0.9965751,0.0005592371,0.0001711232,0.00007308766,0.00002896307,0.0001186835,0.000002800975,0.0001372536],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008145239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04090959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1338108562440279,"score_gpt":0.41676141375275,"score_spread":0.2829505575087221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}