{"id":"W2189564813","doi":"10.24043/isj.206","title":"The Quarantine Protection of Sub-Antarctic Australia: Two Islands, Two Regimes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Island Studies Journal","topic":"Polar Research and Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department of the Environment, Australian Government; Australian Antarctic Division; University of Tasmania; Australian Government","keywords":"Quarantine; IUCN Red List; Biosecurity; Geography; Endangered species; Politics; Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Political science; Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Law; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008175155,0.0001402434,0.0001962021,0.0005211569,0.001566549,0.001358628,0.0006829805,0.0005855064,0.00146952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002039847,0.0002172915,0.0001656703,0.0005179101,0.001955037,0.0008666121,0.002024452,0.000819868,0.0001368552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002551699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002301306,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0621058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1572316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993974,0.0001685927,0.00003589738,0.00005880826,0.0001276823,0.0002116168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983375,0.0002117067,0.0005071363,0.0001359092,0.0002596186,0.0005481956],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001135078,0.000820835,0.6862459,0.000628805,0.0001255208,0.003244956,0.06266953,0.0007860999,0.02590131,0.01845165,0.003038193,0.196952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003609391,0.0003111732,0.9713848,0.00009760434,0.00002888138,0.0002745099,0.01374396,0.0004196035,0.0008398042,0.0009558969,0.01188602,0.00002171321],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886707,0.0003458752,0.0001585627,0.0009107434,0.000008948447,0.00005412695,0.00002310209,0.000003734382,0.009824217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995495,0.0003317113,0.0006353016,0.0002516389,0.00000866383,0.00005392981,0.00003800778,0.000002725491,0.003183058],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0621058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1234886,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04417739774207553,"score_gpt":0.3468263567667879,"score_spread":0.3026489590247124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}