{"id":"W2189564813","doi":"10.24043/isj.206","title":"The Quarantine Protection of Sub-Antarctic Australia: Two Islands, Two Regimes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Island Studies Journal","topic":"Polar Research and Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department of the Environment, Australian Government; Australian Antarctic Division; University of Tasmania; Australian Government","keywords":"Quarantine; IUCN Red List; Biosecurity; Geography; Endangered species; Politics; Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Political science; Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Law; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001916766,0.0000965423,0.0001679443,0.000038748,0.0006645381,0.0000287162,0.0001866606,0.00002650582,0.0001892016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002135431,0.00005432003,0.00007110802,0.0001578043,0.0003733532,0.0001173982,0.000105133,0.000353502,0.00009608969],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001016233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000106298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000330146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008379091,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986885,0.00009991115,0.0002925889,0.0001185548,0.0003228034,0.000477668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994645,0.0001510809,0.0001541212,0.0001184553,0.00003261611,0.00007924018],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001454524,0.0002580562,0.8573345,0.0000448023,0.0007870257,0.0003269392,0.004195405,0.0003292085,0.02922699,0.0002529246,0.05412168,0.05166792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007221843,0.00276124,0.8702058,0.000115103,0.0001315658,0.002997715,0.006150588,0.0002755783,0.0215776,0.0156313,0.07233927,0.0005923616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950313,0.0007371511,0.0004456905,0.0008891266,0.0003119925,0.0001514663,0.000001919563,0.000006577569,0.002424777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973819,0.0009975117,0.00005841242,0.00002037104,0.0002014359,0.000004024904,2.885427e-7,0.00000533215,0.001330732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05107556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5111157,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04417739774207553,"score_gpt":0.3468263567667879,"score_spread":0.3026489590247124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}