{"id":"W2189853013","doi":"10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2015.3.11","title":"Team-based Learning in the Humanities Classroom: “Women’s Environmental Writing” as a Case Study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","topic":"Problem and Project Based Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Team-based learning; Psychology; Environmental education; Pedagogy; Sustainability; Accountability; Knight; Sociology; Mathematics education; Medical education; Ecology; Medicine; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04739183,0.0001617353,0.0001889643,0.0002111437,0.01724339,0.001260599,0.0006064763,0.00008541288,0.00004227968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004604486,0.00009790159,0.00008553362,0.0001409786,0.0004767223,0.0003338952,0.00002792618,0.005192423,0.000004082505],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004462902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001285638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1218511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1218423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9906704,0.007719342,0.0003263752,0.0001682387,0.0004815914,0.0006340354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969771,0.002298221,0.0002760006,0.0001541561,0.00004982482,0.0002447314],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005759995,0.00003903481,0.21215,0.0000111183,0.00005392728,0.0002436185,0.7535502,0.006138236,0.00001044811,0.001485555,0.00008443615,0.02617584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000841878,0.0006346193,0.0031458,0.0000730157,0.00005444084,0.0005740668,0.8980117,0.0003360589,0.000001329214,0.001088088,0.09507365,0.0001653971],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933317,0.0009599447,0.00004283967,0.002202931,0.0001472251,0.0004683944,0.000001737143,0.00001965552,0.00282558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974471,0.000007180966,0.00007975608,0.0005423724,0.0002849683,0.00003911318,0.000001285218,0.00002299814,0.001575274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2090042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0756316219608576,"score_gpt":0.3353600901373813,"score_spread":0.2597284681765237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}