{"id":"W2191751886","doi":"10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2015.3.10","title":"Collaborative Learning in Problem Solving: A Case Study in Metacognitive Learning","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Collaborative learning; Metacognition; Collaborative writing; Preference; Cooperative learning; Mathematics education; Modalities; Group work; Pedagogy; Teaching method; Sociology; Cognition; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01125513,0.0008149329,0.0007247212,0.001972471,0.009916929,0.004830418,0.002909337,0.003611872,0.001647556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02963009,0.0006957219,0.0008243396,0.001959591,0.006714423,0.00365446,0.005141608,0.003524172,0.0004866839],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003601938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003484948,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008762949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01991438,"domain_scores_codex":[0.985815,0.009990676,0.0003704853,0.0009630524,0.001738229,0.001122451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9679596,0.02434198,0.0019982,0.001694121,0.001668468,0.002337713],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008080537,0.001019454,0.02022059,0.0001643916,0.00002642054,0.005191399,0.9420846,0.0005391875,0.001361742,0.004603932,0.0006058997,0.02410172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008440456,0.001293353,0.0254201,0.0002632992,0.00005508198,0.01053935,0.9084101,0.006078033,0.004221587,0.005603655,0.03791649,0.0001145022],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857274,0.0002329335,0.008841624,0.0007336331,0.00001215827,0.000189133,0.00001576034,0.00002552502,0.004221962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846684,0.000318193,0.01147039,0.0001530247,0.00001735599,0.0001671945,0.00002687962,0.00002929097,0.003149279],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01125513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05952352,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.106599472070892,"score_gpt":0.4107981399222188,"score_spread":0.3041986678513269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}