{"id":"W2191751886","doi":"10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2015.3.10","title":"Collaborative Learning in Problem Solving: A Case Study in Metacognitive Learning","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Collaborative learning; Metacognition; Collaborative writing; Preference; Cooperative learning; Mathematics education; Modalities; Group work; Pedagogy; Teaching method; Sociology; Cognition; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07452218,0.0003191111,0.0005173668,0.000831071,0.004670588,0.0004692941,0.0004374596,0.0001760363,0.00003231899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01965993,0.0002196269,0.0001004446,0.0007981114,0.0002611485,0.0003221627,0.00005879302,0.01635943,0.000005138123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003181177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008004992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05678582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04690301,"domain_scores_codex":[0.972568,0.02521902,0.0007144316,0.0003869178,0.0003111625,0.0008004234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938911,0.004519605,0.0006298724,0.0002009994,0.0004293006,0.0003290898],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002405103,0.00007855473,0.4142657,0.00001509033,0.0002569701,0.001139759,0.5013399,0.02396762,0.00005148998,0.001086683,0.00005100985,0.05750675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004111927,0.001948674,0.08237624,0.0003624044,0.000184627,0.004243381,0.8913532,0.001547546,0.000007031089,0.001541779,0.01183096,0.0004921608],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910501,0.001743532,0.001049155,0.000942548,0.0004098311,0.0007620392,0.000001622385,0.00003642842,0.004004703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946603,0.000003056489,0.001897345,0.00008033089,0.0001845293,0.00005393148,0.00000246056,0.00006434763,0.003053736],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3900134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966252,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.106599472070892,"score_gpt":0.4107981399222188,"score_spread":0.3041986678513269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}