{"id":"W2192439001","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2015-0018","title":"Roles of spatial scale in quantifying stock–recruitment relationships for American lobsters in the inshore Gulf of Maine","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"American lobster; Spatial ecology; Homarus; Stock assessment; Scale (ratio); Temporal scales; Stock (firearms); Spatial analysis; Spatial variability; Ecology; Fishery; Geography; Environmental science; Crustacean; Cartography; Biology; Statistics; Fishing; Mathematics; Remote sensing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002723324,0.0004020544,0.0002872613,0.001334119,0.0003209099,0.0007805017,0.0003578613,0.000393879,0.000356875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006237176,0.000247959,0.0005732187,0.0008206837,0.0005346666,0.0007263522,0.0008546147,0.0002394911,0.00007062338],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004268055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003972438,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02216835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05691787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999527,0.0002154241,0.00003745088,0.0001320994,0.00004617608,0.00004190494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969692,0.002053731,0.0004199246,0.0002710283,0.0001994416,0.0000868405],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000823039,0.00002644828,0.9402092,0.00005757498,0.000206955,0.0000980273,0.0002757725,0.0400149,0.003416667,0.0003398168,0.00008183836,0.01519054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008044563,0.00002312947,0.8767,0.00001997437,0.00005615981,0.00004987835,0.0002666561,0.1216057,0.0005278693,0.0005350177,0.0001845483,0.00002294981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957788,0.000137513,0.003634478,0.00002127946,0.0000014619,0.00000601582,0.00009295247,0.00003759604,0.0002898369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997367,0.00003538811,0.002421954,0.000005601931,0.000001446872,0.000006363779,0.0001136302,0.000004984699,0.00004375395],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02216835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04407859,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1572101308467166,"score_gpt":0.3111029455434561,"score_spread":0.1538928146967395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}