{"id":"W2195198209","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.007","title":"Debunking trickle-down ecosystem services: The fallacy of omnipotent, homogeneous beneficiaries","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Business; Stakeholder; Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Service (business); Goods and services; Natural resource economics; Ecosystem management; Environmental economics; Economics; Marketing; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006242957,0.0001765219,0.0003388262,0.00002230741,0.0001719158,0.00007556941,0.000665079,0.0001417631,0.0006861925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002089486,0.0001062763,0.0001081099,0.0001164764,0.00002704389,0.0001980631,0.0004148398,0.00009619971,0.0007973409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002032558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002278271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006119325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0289612,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986711,0.00008324904,0.0004822438,0.000318782,0.0001071674,0.0003374493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990374,0.0001618422,0.0002834106,0.0003562738,0.0000156026,0.0001454286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001726078,0.00048605,0.5155751,0.0001497325,0.0001619494,0.00003043797,0.00204819,0.4713093,0.00008676812,0.001597266,0.0005970314,0.007785579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004467951,0.001758956,0.280065,0.0001188421,0.0003224262,0.0003029127,0.007162347,0.4294293,0.00231504,0.03135929,0.2405573,0.002140646],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904367,0.000138476,0.00001896124,0.0003295974,0.000322719,0.0002632056,0.00002701851,0.00004450036,0.008418848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991375,0.00008210351,0.0001968118,0.0003988971,0.00009887346,0.00002470025,0.00001047952,0.00001259129,0.00003804075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2399603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999806,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01783953341147444,"score_gpt":0.1965081591854382,"score_spread":0.1786686257739637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}