{"id":"W2196217095","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1039","title":"Case Comment: Mack et al. v. Attorney General of Canada - Rethinking the Contemporary Conception of Judicial Discretion and Justice","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial discretion; Discretion; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Judicial review","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008368054,0.0000588713,0.0001940475,0.00002094972,0.0009196308,0.00001837447,0.00004924418,0.0000415021,0.000005994124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001288827,0.00004379038,0.00004562749,0.00007683654,0.0009850893,0.000117163,0.00001540581,0.0001268833,2.862538e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007017652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00103216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6922344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2602275,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989479,0.0003144907,0.0002826554,0.00004950922,0.0002953139,0.0001101631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992845,0.000118901,0.000345806,0.00002167265,0.000178917,0.00005017834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002754782,0.00001485523,0.0002261429,0.000008004749,0.00004107683,0.00001963653,0.0155466,0.000002134703,0.00004635142,0.9798387,0.004019388,0.0002095118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002444044,0.0003294306,0.004294968,0.0001757264,0.0003683652,0.0003028302,0.07747563,0.00001636775,0.0002300916,0.2210586,0.6929193,0.0003846642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8124426,0.001212521,0.0001163711,0.09353331,0.0005407463,0.0001638204,0.00006141176,0.000003812478,0.09192541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903578,0.0002746407,0.00002889455,0.008755669,0.0005593193,3.761071e-7,5.785059e-7,0.00000230571,0.00002037219],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7587802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7532715,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0614866984781885,"score_gpt":0.3380691248406871,"score_spread":0.2765824263624986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}