{"id":"W2196217095","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1039","title":"Case Comment: Mack et al. v. Attorney General of Canada - Rethinking the Contemporary Conception of Judicial Discretion and Justice","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial discretion; Discretion; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Judicial review","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001261674,0.0006408946,0.000346955,0.0007945392,0.02950877,0.004334575,0.00291384,0.02232476,0.01066894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004663843,0.0007035523,0.0007444353,0.001777608,0.007310854,0.001626438,0.002200211,0.01777852,0.0008937845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04642844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07409059,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9625698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9848408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970639,0.000183192,0.00007436421,0.0003678239,0.0007366053,0.001574091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986566,0.0003740716,0.0001204924,0.00006398774,0.0003747951,0.0004100937],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001200374,0.00005058403,0.01360603,0.0001502532,0.00003645141,0.01026715,0.02605329,0.0003526584,0.0006718009,0.1515289,0.7847157,0.01244723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008909406,0.00004172833,0.0191589,0.0006022314,0.0001074563,0.004114626,0.03589155,0.0006118929,0.0008183652,0.01434519,0.9240035,0.0002153568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.06852299,0.003555246,0.000659818,0.7341576,0.00316429,0.0001981297,0.0007572733,0.000104687,0.18888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3495523,0.002708784,0.0004835526,0.463751,0.001150302,0.0001599818,0.0001488541,0.00006589828,0.1819793],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04642844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3368635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0614866984781885,"score_gpt":0.3380691248406871,"score_spread":0.2765824263624986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}