{"id":"W2197445994","doi":"10.18192/uojm.v4i1.1036","title":"Neglecting the null: the pitfalls of underreporting negative results in preclinical research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Ottawa Journal of Medicine","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Publication bias; Transparency (behavior); Open science; Foundation (evidence); Preclinical research; Research integrity; Psychology; Publishing; Medicine; Political science; Public relations; Meta-analysis; Medical physics; Pathology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009650934,0.0000732867,0.000315446,0.0001727568,0.0001714084,0.000003695364,0.0005300207,0.00004340496,0.00004121822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01565275,0.0000416006,0.00007775216,0.0003320499,0.0009682404,0.00008442674,0.0001208255,0.0008013363,0.000001289878],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004448077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008865885,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001210908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001525247,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973871,0.001051797,0.0006926665,0.000118787,0.0005815984,0.0001681026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895539,0.008188691,0.001431589,0.000200267,0.0005688139,0.00005676719],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01956291,0.001722762,0.45549,0.0005925113,0.001458276,0.003112609,0.2760093,0.002149279,0.05857206,0.02058144,0.04321174,0.1175371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01292237,0.01877422,0.771638,0.006626893,0.0002033918,0.00104143,0.1582706,0.005552161,0.001265074,0.01136031,0.01207364,0.00027191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9707372,0.0001379823,0.0004327245,0.008575783,0.0001007528,0.00008773457,0.000001124826,0.000004565308,0.01992211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987809,0.00004734995,0.0006325383,0.00003678701,0.000237432,2.220657e-8,2.201113e-7,0.000005277303,0.000259449],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.316148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9926388,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3603765382270839,"score_gpt":0.4710033459523337,"score_spread":0.1106268077252498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}