{"id":"W2198285942","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2355838","title":"Substantive Unfairness of Pre-Dispute Arbitration Clauses in Consumer Contracts: The Argument for the Unconscionability Doctrine","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Doctrine; Arbitration; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Arbitration clause; Dispute resolution; Business; Compulsory arbitration; Law; Economics; Political science; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001956885,0.0001282802,0.000159503,0.00009909939,0.0003068675,0.00008133097,0.0002817441,0.00004709962,0.00006948257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001559222,0.0000738962,0.0001317631,0.0003182051,0.0001466268,0.0005508207,0.00003146939,0.0006026184,0.000007606081],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002347654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004793544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006967237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0160394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984509,0.00003518337,0.0004043251,0.0001471543,0.0002031829,0.0007592482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989725,0.0001857243,0.0003754462,0.0001832734,0.0002734847,0.000009618313],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004588945,0.0002350767,0.008853864,0.00001725576,0.0001557627,3.961652e-7,0.0001201438,0.00005229808,0.00009825181,0.9837579,0.0001512098,0.006098976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004616642,0.0001586759,0.2623017,0.00009827039,0.0005408988,0.00005213639,0.01264196,0.004524365,0.0004809136,0.6068134,0.1073099,0.0004610777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.936292,0.004184818,0.03751041,0.008065642,0.00103782,0.00220665,0.00001279114,0.00006371521,0.01062615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985034,0.0007485936,0.00001900852,0.000307943,0.000209829,0.00005849609,0.000004250233,0.00001071581,0.0001378047],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3769444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.895036,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02114793856633545,"score_gpt":0.2469174074027573,"score_spread":0.2257694688364219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}