{"id":"W2198326083","doi":"10.1080/10255840701704553","title":"Towards a biomechanics-based technique for assessing myocardial contractility: an inverse problem approach","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering","topic":"Elasticity and Material Modeling","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Robarts Clinical Trials","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Air Force; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Ontario Innovation Trust","keywords":"Cardiac cycle; Contractility; Biomechanics; Ventricle; Contraction (grammar); Kinematics; Computer science; Cardiac Ventricle; Inverse problem; Inverse method; Isotropy; Biomedical engineering; Algorithm; Mathematics; Physics; Mathematical analysis; Cardiology; Medicine; Anatomy; Classical mechanics; Applied mathematics; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001316484,0.0007958175,0.0007348655,0.001399427,0.0002665818,0.001248319,0.00122967,0.00156334,0.001186991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002648826,0.0005937328,0.0008989409,0.0005400504,0.0008718026,0.001287963,0.001073521,0.001160531,0.0006601857],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000309783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006721148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006195652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007222556,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995196,0.0001346162,0.00003586768,0.00009416294,0.0001962687,0.00001959256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999283,0.000354794,0.00008315199,0.000103917,0.0001491269,0.00002597429],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009422547,0.0001812985,0.001760382,0.000548102,0.0001250132,0.0003123074,0.0004974327,0.3027606,0.2661104,0.05563856,0.001361135,0.3706107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002087943,0.00009441191,0.0008025839,0.00004245061,0.00002803353,0.0004484305,0.00007236742,0.9507205,0.02212524,0.01851643,0.00707951,0.00004921056],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001284261,0.0000704249,0.9983364,0.00005787235,0.000007110275,0.00001001385,0.000007336344,0.00005973442,0.0001669036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02557623,0.0002896555,0.9733033,0.00005851874,0.00002802396,0.00007749998,0.00003975221,0.00004594511,0.0005809935],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00156334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006962359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04216333910500092,"score_gpt":0.3128491540953923,"score_spread":0.2706858149903913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}