{"id":"W2199444371","doi":"10.1139/cjz-2014-0318","title":"Comparative analysis of abundance–occupancy relationships for species at risk at both broad taxonomic and spatial scales","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Zoology","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Academy of Finland","keywords":"Occupancy; Biology; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Taxonomic rank; Lichen; Spatial ecology; Relative species abundance; Taxon","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007377421,0.0001986244,0.0003642314,0.002307912,0.00064392,0.0005313787,0.0004209717,0.0001820976,0.002029919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002546565,0.000124792,0.0003616002,0.002112396,0.0005533298,0.0005109868,0.0009440064,0.0003025878,0.000139647],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001021063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001068863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3575285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6257225,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993278,0.0001131122,0.00003137203,0.0001744172,0.0001788941,0.0001744227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980698,0.0005822919,0.0004557373,0.0001522374,0.0004418656,0.0002981431],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005422811,0.00001032633,0.9905097,0.00002524897,0.0001916784,0.00003249099,0.0006403498,0.000262454,0.002110691,0.0002568701,0.0001668291,0.005739134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.041167e-7,0.00001009059,0.9990919,0.000001648335,0.00001182434,0.00002136635,0.0004590666,0.0001922324,0.00003590575,0.00003258445,0.0001403261,0.000002780823],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962289,0.000235834,0.0009181685,0.00004055506,0.000002930755,0.000009353291,0.0006639482,0.0000144516,0.001885817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987417,0.00005190329,0.0004496172,0.000007775251,0.000001752568,0.00000491662,0.0004983835,0.000003581078,0.0002404213],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6424716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7108948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04580327852934632,"score_gpt":0.2434099215244218,"score_spread":0.1976066429950754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}