{"id":"W2199775830","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2015.07.061","title":"ROTATIONAL ATHERECTOMY IN UNCROSSABLE AND UNDILATABLE LESIONS: OUTCOMES POST SECOND-GENERATION DRUG ELUTING STENTS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Research Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Mace; Myocardial infarction; Internal medicine; Cardiology; Drug-eluting stent; Stent; Retrospective cohort study; Ejection fraction; Dyslipidemia; Surgery; Restenosis; Coronary artery disease; Cumulative incidence; Revascularization; Diabetes mellitus; Conventional PCI; Heart failure; Cohort; Disease","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003896659,0.0003951901,0.0006817442,0.0006962552,0.00041594,0.00113175,0.0004141532,0.0006099287,0.002533637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001042764,0.0001917258,0.0009116494,0.0006504175,0.0005954141,0.0005739289,0.0005583112,0.001020583,0.0005376378],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005424411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002933331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000749655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001731164,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996054,0.00003920685,0.00003429157,0.00007855552,0.00006532928,0.0001773126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991912,0.0001363494,0.0003009869,0.00009555994,0.00004922139,0.0002266212],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01684511,0.0018531,0.9038212,0.0001677133,0.0006952267,0.01096765,0.000409929,0.0005018499,0.01168743,0.0006518692,0.0008344224,0.05156449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001773177,0.00331169,0.9833808,0.00003035296,0.0002574995,0.01000783,0.0004498526,0.0004810578,0.0009090817,0.0004887865,0.0004569413,0.0000487679],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984069,0.0003724071,0.00016324,0.00004965253,0.00001714836,0.00000742773,0.0001032838,0.000004762132,0.000875201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991068,0.0002023668,0.00006415361,0.00003935828,0.00004372632,0.000004565298,0.000257495,0.000003297871,0.0002780884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002533637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0084759,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04869384743091252,"score_gpt":0.2933911452871794,"score_spread":0.2446972978562669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}