{"id":"W2200208573","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2015.12.009","title":"Rationale and design of the EXenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering (EXSCEL) trial","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Heart Journal","topic":"Diabetes Treatment and Management","field":"Medicine","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute; University of Toronto; Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"British Microcirculation Society; Novartis; Novo Nordisk; Merck; Bayer; AstraZeneca","keywords":"Exenatide; Medicine; Glycemic; Clinical endpoint; Placebo; Myocardial infarction; Stroke (engine); Type 2 diabetes; Internal medicine; Semaglutide; Liraglutide; Randomized controlled trial; Diabetes mellitus; Insulin; Endocrinology; Alternative medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006214803,0.00006386342,0.0003220782,0.00005548296,0.00003603657,0.000007510841,0.00004446133,0.000007070415,0.000007482195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008429711,0.00003986996,0.0001294573,0.0001220603,0.000074121,0.00003622138,0.00003732707,0.00006941781,7.415396e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003789054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008401881,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008185608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001781782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990568,0.0001241075,0.0002260449,0.00007776787,0.0004244195,0.00009082559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994925,0.00004482963,0.0001172892,0.0001705589,0.00009222108,0.00008264602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.04132419,0.01839059,0.5567526,0.0002537798,0.0319066,0.0003110744,0.02548703,0.0580502,0.00617441,0.0001150521,0.03441904,0.2268154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.368893,0.0961596,0.3844633,0.0008460214,0.01204951,0.0006710792,0.05400542,0.002124586,0.01352817,0.0005495056,0.06578558,0.0009242895],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974057,0.0005910918,0.0006546351,0.0002254011,0.0001376057,0.0008713088,4.39783e-7,0.000003582322,0.0001102289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989108,0.0000537968,0.0007657353,0.00005001707,0.0000925238,0.00001442119,2.456954e-7,0.000006726853,0.0001057587],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3275688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.162585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05568336115756114,"score_gpt":0.2985380026289485,"score_spread":0.2428546414713873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}