{"id":"W2200613020","doi":"10.1890/es15-00174.1","title":"Selection for forage and avoidance of risk by woodland caribou (<i>Rangifer tarandus caribou</i>) at coarse and local scales","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecosphere","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; University of Alberta; University of Guelph","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Forest Service; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Selection (genetic algorithm); Woodland; Forage; Spatial ecology; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Scale (ratio); Predation; Temporal scales; Taiga; Boreal; Geography; Biology; Cartography; Computer science; Engineering; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002118099,0.00009568656,0.0001379758,0.000005188686,0.0001443024,0.00001025619,0.00004753668,0.0001133363,0.0001399982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005339033,0.00008978186,0.00002076823,0.0000653126,0.0002128127,0.000153548,0.00005387091,0.00007389167,0.00001774413],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007411779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009823301,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001390048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02201022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993702,0.00004278545,0.0001343209,0.0002141369,0.00008432133,0.0001542891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996439,0.00009312369,0.00008371854,0.00007674629,0.00001443761,0.00008802702],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001808506,0.00003157638,0.8810676,0.00001176141,0.00001405286,6.002747e-7,0.0003103138,0.0003896514,0.0002211673,0.00001923112,0.1112499,0.00650328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003485169,0.0004552098,0.9369387,0.00001745296,0.0000868049,0.0000347494,0.0004689526,0.03195425,0.001863377,0.00218,0.02217188,0.0003434329],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949661,0.0004818566,0.003345679,0.0001567183,0.00007274822,0.0002182611,0.0001271109,0.00001547433,0.0006160912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982731,0.00004894678,0.0008964593,0.0001250554,0.00002085716,0.00002704909,0.0000359339,0.000008804917,0.0005638452],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08907801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958355,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006302159327823856,"score_gpt":0.1970239088385363,"score_spread":0.1907217495107125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}