{"id":"W2201174992","doi":"10.1017/s0008423915000530","title":"Questioning Judges with a Questionable Process: An Analysis of Committee Appearances by Canadian Supreme Court Candidates","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University; The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Interview; Parliament; Political science; Law; Politics; Government (linguistics); Jurisprudence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001749315,0.00009158828,0.0002628358,0.0005620273,0.001036775,0.0001567669,0.000521609,0.00004727551,0.00005975212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001286694,0.00007377137,0.00004281858,0.001776548,0.004313076,0.0006964782,0.000007370773,0.0001334983,0.000003014144],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001125347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02522468,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9829285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978613,0.00009414487,0.0002629941,0.0001580063,0.0007636439,0.0008599197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994561,0.00005891485,0.0001240402,0.00008401032,0.001553272,0.003618834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005495286,0.00001152023,0.5026354,0.000001686918,0.00004747564,0.00001589114,0.001953153,0.0002667516,0.000004877724,0.4945346,0.0004582319,0.00006490915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005820879,0.0006799503,0.8533881,0.0002715535,0.0007227192,0.00004559469,0.06651437,0.0007426284,0.0002029129,0.05957061,0.01662828,0.0006512385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672486,0.0006487952,0.0001423215,0.009955967,0.0001615266,0.00008681253,0.0001012435,0.00000756007,0.02164716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993246,0.000005692152,0.0001342011,0.0003747037,0.0001134681,0.000001846701,0.000003285497,0.000002848547,0.00003931383],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.434964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02290729195073627,"score_gpt":0.3041602519042559,"score_spread":0.2812529599535196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}