{"id":"W2201174992","doi":"10.1017/s0008423915000530","title":"Questioning Judges with a Questionable Process: An Analysis of Committee Appearances by Canadian Supreme Court Candidates","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University; The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Interview; Parliament; Political science; Law; Politics; Government (linguistics); Jurisprudence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01976274,0.0004277444,0.0007285796,0.007415109,0.008470872,0.005342293,0.002506738,0.001676341,0.003542433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09917184,0.0004811844,0.000463332,0.01155146,0.003517489,0.00120274,0.00292947,0.00199642,0.0006005092],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02750053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02443269,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9080637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9440539,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9735124,0.008016385,0.0009320443,0.002146089,0.0114215,0.003971756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8890516,0.04533801,0.01731268,0.003480042,0.0373427,0.007474992],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004372511,0.0002325213,0.7955322,0.0003394475,0.0001222752,0.0006413318,0.140035,0.0004977432,0.002184301,0.004217499,0.01607992,0.03968054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001230158,0.00003318377,0.9069903,0.0001323778,0.00003251616,0.0000576352,0.06953127,0.001057854,0.0003232479,0.0003319642,0.02142407,0.00007327566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800229,0.000549173,0.0006576886,0.001160939,0.00005524232,0.0002857004,0.001415375,0.00002460305,0.01582832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940705,0.0002737981,0.0008554402,0.0002604056,0.00003451881,0.0001473052,0.00135223,0.0000227142,0.002983093],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9724995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1995313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02290729195073627,"score_gpt":0.3041602519042559,"score_spread":0.2812529599535196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}