{"id":"W2201761680","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0014:wcwdmb>2.0.co;2","title":"RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT VIEWPOINT: WHY COMPENSATING WILDLIFE DAMAGES MAY BE BAD FOR CONSERVATION","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":236,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Damages; Subsidy; Natural resource economics; Wildlife conservation; Human–wildlife conflict; Incentive; Business; Population; Agriculture; Wildlife management; Livestock; Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006926364,0.0004999755,0.0008755235,0.001027493,0.001068225,0.003876851,0.001754848,0.006971007,0.01574463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02815362,0.0001689679,0.0004795047,0.001075204,0.005807351,0.007248383,0.0009504996,0.004632061,0.002255049],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002347735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00208818,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004140327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00330433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997203,0.001334618,0.0001337531,0.0005615869,0.0005626949,0.0002043929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977514,0.01443928,0.001689559,0.001171926,0.004623569,0.0005617168],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001401941,0.0001559301,0.005351449,0.0005629314,0.00009471487,0.000391709,0.0005396277,0.002820545,0.0004835627,0.7057339,0.1898956,0.09382992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009800617,0.00009989963,0.004640101,0.0005239343,0.00004158388,0.0003136664,0.001342023,0.003917332,0.0004563728,0.8642165,0.1243002,0.00005031698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009266453,0.0213996,0.004735381,0.9189631,0.00185868,0.00001850279,0.0001879546,0.00003581875,0.04353441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.747573,0.04460762,0.006251467,0.1586794,0.01880724,0.0001177153,0.0001943787,0.00007870885,0.02369041],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01574463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05267102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1790888247722988,"score_gpt":0.3040580216224322,"score_spread":0.1249691968501334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}