{"id":"W2201761680","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0014:wcwdmb>2.0.co;2","title":"RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT VIEWPOINT: WHY COMPENSATING WILDLIFE DAMAGES MAY BE BAD FOR CONSERVATION","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":236,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Damages; Subsidy; Natural resource economics; Wildlife conservation; Human–wildlife conflict; Incentive; Business; Population; Agriculture; Wildlife management; Livestock; Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003479295,0.0001504356,0.0003537169,0.0004773689,0.0002227034,0.0001290096,0.0002422686,0.00005499758,0.0001515423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003688119,0.0001672482,0.00009974701,0.000140515,0.00009852178,0.0004936542,0.000171967,0.0001657044,0.00007230376],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003126787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005276494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001919656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001208313,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981825,0.00003934695,0.001045205,0.0002954286,0.0001355023,0.0003020593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988242,0.0001345548,0.0006648944,0.0002254142,0.00004672656,0.0001041517],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001232665,0.0004062328,0.09436663,0.0004631261,0.000624424,0.00001339306,0.0005903592,0.002698099,0.000007321714,0.4954474,0.3888533,0.0164065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001971463,0.0002506478,0.1315238,0.0001126807,0.00003857222,0.000009660954,0.0009829524,0.003812361,0.00001183288,0.01095218,0.8501199,0.0002140044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6819283,0.002436067,0.03349596,0.234018,0.0009381509,0.002138476,0.00006839856,0.00003414575,0.04494251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8754213,0.01003614,0.07321139,0.03501375,0.0007826272,0.0001103593,0.00003626276,0.00007442263,0.005313679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4844952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6820185,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1790888247722988,"score_gpt":0.3040580216224322,"score_spread":0.1249691968501334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}