{"id":"W2202815954","doi":"10.5558/tfc2012-034","title":"Aerial forest herbicide application: Comparative assessment of risk mitigation strategies in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of New Brunswick; Tembec; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Risk assessment; Risk management; Audit; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001342108,0.0004046055,0.0003604074,0.00224284,0.001270989,0.001171161,0.001014801,0.0003502558,0.00116784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002680765,0.0001262187,0.0005539263,0.002895992,0.0005367766,0.0003117768,0.000721451,0.000287108,0.0000738728],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04367907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03841833,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9784147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978585,0.0002979674,0.00007516127,0.0001306237,0.001213181,0.0004245614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979274,0.0002953044,0.0003460098,0.00004346445,0.001183144,0.0002045648],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003425223,0.0006796446,0.471133,0.001690007,0.001326472,0.0005323096,0.002077219,0.05581143,0.01194348,0.005867172,0.005858123,0.439656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001209679,0.001527848,0.9599383,0.0002110641,0.0007341824,0.0001807847,0.004594215,0.01265617,0.003644649,0.0006067326,0.01569244,0.00009275069],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9633967,0.007190489,0.001292104,0.0005776734,0.00001309208,0.0003183719,0.001869834,0.00005982623,0.02528191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893701,0.004575789,0.00187785,0.0001312551,0.000003874936,0.00004278739,0.0009400529,0.000007208318,0.003051032],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04367907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3169153,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008773573787901577,"score_gpt":0.2520235815495852,"score_spread":0.2432500077616836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}