{"id":"W2204844082","doi":"10.1139/cjb-2015-0171","title":"Growth and competitive abilities of the federally endangered <i>Lindera melissifolia</i> and the potentially invasive <i>Brunnichia ovata</i> in varying densities, hydrologic regimes, and light availabilities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Botany","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Army Corps of Engineers","keywords":"Biology; Endangered species; Biomass (ecology); Interspecific competition; Competition (biology); Perennial plant; Abiotic component; Shrub; Ecology; Invasive species; Botany; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001230713,0.0001407703,0.0001312886,0.0001857161,0.0001788348,0.0002151764,0.0001784323,0.0001267402,0.000604987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001911216,0.00009852653,0.0001392786,0.0000690437,0.00009778448,0.0002135806,0.0002191775,0.0002173943,0.00009964551],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004242057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008754557,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007286421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01526929,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999382,0.00001114883,0.000004520502,0.00001928235,0.000009058581,0.00001778197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998115,0.00004476049,0.00004855273,0.00001029425,0.00002119067,0.0000637888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000625261,0.0002600098,0.07518636,0.00003285886,0.00003023179,0.0001634149,0.0003580582,0.0005125697,0.9163905,0.0001318041,0.00007887801,0.006230093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002285066,0.001046009,0.9681207,0.000005442861,0.00002496204,0.0002518296,0.0004985397,0.004480099,0.02470827,0.00004629058,0.0007792704,0.00001582491],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998406,0.00001349265,0.00001648781,0.000003028791,3.621462e-7,5.729277e-7,0.00001689256,9.554163e-7,0.0001076701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996026,0.00001040067,0.00006432485,0.000008028642,5.721166e-7,0.000002125215,0.00007830122,8.770742e-7,0.0002326718],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007286421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01448804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008949432574583884,"score_gpt":0.1917344380832235,"score_spread":0.1827850055086396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}