{"id":"W2204905985","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2015v40n4a2926","title":"The Appropriation of a Digitally-Augmented Agora: Field Study of the Structuration and Spatialization of an Issue Public in Urban Space","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Digital Media and Philosophy","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Spatialization; Appropriation; Public space; Sociology; Agora; Field (mathematics); Power (physics); Media studies; Precinct; Space (punctuation); Politics; Public relations; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Engineering; Computer science; Architectural engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004925628,0.00004798685,0.0001084906,0.0001385028,0.0000525987,0.00008540207,0.0007315174,0.00002953476,4.896551e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004366309,0.0000326446,0.00001704017,0.0003584053,0.00006157105,0.000791001,0.00004837082,0.00008535506,5.24148e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004166093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003767539,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001942778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02446353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990684,0.0002372982,0.0003776056,0.0000491646,0.0002054023,0.00006209691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983017,0.0001052573,0.0005705678,0.000480046,0.0004471425,0.00009528089],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001782227,0.000795259,0.3225113,0.00008745015,0.0001756191,0.00000386534,0.1673923,0.003527208,0.001015351,0.2239298,0.0008056101,0.279578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007330898,0.007313319,0.6647636,0.0006876679,0.0001062177,0.00007139835,0.02347128,0.07341943,0.01262861,0.2034174,0.006181314,0.0006088686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928321,0.000277604,0.002348498,0.003570157,0.0001407889,0.0002288197,0.000001857532,0.000001575178,0.0005985783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996267,0.000009941253,0.0003170017,0.00002011469,0.00001500908,0.000001566121,0.000002532106,0.00000263481,0.000004490916],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3422523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02425086750557983,"score_gpt":0.2345281663202638,"score_spread":0.210277298814684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}