{"id":"W2207566727","doi":"10.2172/920022","title":"Evaluation of Alternatives to the Ontario Hydro Method as a Reference Method for CAMR","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sorbent; Mercury (programming language); Elemental mercury; Environmental science; Process engineering; Computer science; Chemistry; Waste management; Engineering; Adsorption","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01827159,0.001571866,0.001010147,0.003190215,0.001949784,0.002597934,0.005273984,0.002612798,0.004592948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02055584,0.000967168,0.001101268,0.002392023,0.001909486,0.001248056,0.001735254,0.001091497,0.00207666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007203068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008122453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1679383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3602812,"domain_scores_codex":[0.958312,0.008646941,0.001185965,0.004703922,0.02613136,0.001019799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908813,0.001536871,0.0009656303,0.0008593131,0.005464672,0.0002921229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005093677,0.001289578,0.03389767,0.004042023,0.0005476121,0.001025134,0.002463763,0.005644084,0.6363606,0.009356285,0.01294392,0.2873357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005466797,0.01343622,0.04422005,0.0009894909,0.0008862619,0.002351398,0.00274611,0.04014767,0.6836284,0.001866651,0.2085907,0.0005904915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6464099,0.02497853,0.2144582,0.003642988,0.002117308,0.01373193,0.01000508,0.002757856,0.08189825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5095367,0.01035964,0.4165378,0.001809684,0.000228923,0.00310072,0.007702121,0.000740993,0.0499834],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8320617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3339216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2455416648783519,"score_gpt":0.4911484398265057,"score_spread":0.2456067749481537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}