{"id":"W22103706","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8287.2011.02037.x","title":"Fuzzy Analogy: A New Approach for Software Cost Estimation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Health Psychology","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Categorical variable; Computer science; Software; Software sizing; Software development; Fuzzy logic; Data mining; Software quality; Estimation; Software metric; Artificial intelligence; Field (mathematics); Machine learning; Software construction; Systems engineering; Mathematics; Programming language; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001697513,0.00009872339,0.0003333372,0.0002707177,0.0001401929,0.0001021567,0.0008332026,0.0001034186,0.00002568126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001648411,0.0001195657,0.00009570854,0.0004611942,0.00003042793,0.0003240293,0.00004953834,0.0004070192,0.00001696806],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001117635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004891114,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004235144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000067594,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981439,0.0001645641,0.0006190168,0.0002757481,0.00028058,0.0005162549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983892,0.0004465329,0.0003262804,0.0002768627,0.0002465194,0.0003145543],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002178714,0.00009913146,0.001187253,0.00004374759,0.00001775288,0.00009728046,0.0000797949,0.001527756,0.000002167038,0.0001363438,0.201707,0.79508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01293692,0.003472516,0.4526178,0.0008905191,0.00002308283,0.1501057,0.00003815464,0.0291185,0.000009928396,0.02360344,0.3262436,0.0009397958],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001320254,0.002184478,0.990204,0.005096765,0.0006794244,0.0003326196,0.000007454632,0.00007608821,0.00009892512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02511493,0.0006435129,0.9693815,0.004207439,0.0004132335,0.000029197,0.00002065243,0.00002664341,0.0001629561],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7941402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4875747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06792452317148749,"score_gpt":0.39047827204493,"score_spread":0.3225537488734425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}