{"id":"W221046306","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v28i1.9049","title":"Computing Contingent Plans via Fully Observable Non-Deterministic Planning","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"AI-based Problem Solving and Planning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Observability; Planner; Observable; Computer science; AKA; Automated planning and scheduling; Robotics; Key (lock); Realization (probability); Artificial intelligence; Robot; Mathematics; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001165397,0.0007310479,0.0005055262,0.0005290706,0.0007166547,0.001279963,0.00115673,0.0007161286,0.00369857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007857949,0.0006533861,0.001242784,0.0005096751,0.001759429,0.001954013,0.002313656,0.001637099,0.0004176367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001103248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002161996,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005151303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01340515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989213,0.0003114541,0.00007712957,0.0002021464,0.0003578823,0.0001302009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951825,0.003598114,0.0002409229,0.0005990318,0.0002504643,0.0001289954],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001468775,0.00008424192,0.001271951,0.0001892811,0.00004740723,0.000252419,0.0002023993,0.8618467,0.002631025,0.07464995,0.001966365,0.05671137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000235979,0.00002255347,0.0001387489,0.00001339435,0.00001230586,0.00002256048,0.00003108125,0.9234937,0.001803033,0.07325609,0.001174013,0.000008820289],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0350464,0.0001176572,0.9565269,0.0003332531,0.0000379658,0.00009701149,0.0002685067,0.003025381,0.0045469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.567875,0.0001574357,0.4290003,0.00009444578,0.00002537992,0.0002084349,0.0006494012,0.0003150444,0.001674469],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005151303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01237291,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06584585395061208,"score_gpt":0.2840481035626157,"score_spread":0.2182022496120036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}