{"id":"W2210556124","doi":"","title":"The Law of the Other: Exploring the Paradox of Legal Pluralism in Australian Native Title","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Legal pluralism; Common law; Precedent; Plaintiff; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Indigenous rights; High Court; Legal history; Sociology; Comparative law; Legal realism; Human rights; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0120072,0.0002895393,0.0007348077,0.002494143,0.01689664,0.0133223,0.002625692,0.006592619,0.002673566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0183571,0.0005379586,0.0004949825,0.002086313,0.06065864,0.01547947,0.01051707,0.00785751,0.0001763073],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01286757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005718568,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04944825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04651645,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9917958,0.004960679,0.000153771,0.0007092236,0.001224819,0.001155574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985081,0.01083312,0.001370613,0.0007106726,0.001003062,0.00100141],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001828305,0.00003339897,0.001146176,0.0000492542,0.000006264752,0.000766188,0.1724249,0.00008020949,0.0001796262,0.8218675,0.0006081592,0.002820134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007437499,0.0001043067,0.01265008,0.0005641247,0.00004299354,0.0009446347,0.2792583,0.002066469,0.0005508318,0.6491343,0.05453693,0.00007275437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6149617,0.003792472,0.003183616,0.04737743,0.0001806956,0.00005555132,0.00002213864,0.00001325061,0.3304132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951441,0.0004787292,0.0002550393,0.001217485,0.00005583439,0.00002164314,0.000003553888,0.000005140598,0.002818377],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04944825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09832084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03131528755828546,"score_gpt":0.2821979715816517,"score_spread":0.2508826840233663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}