{"id":"W2214544152","doi":"","title":"Cognitive Sciences and Literary Studies: A New Paradigm?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian review of comparative literature","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literary criticism; Cognition; Literature; Psychology; Art; Cognitive science; Neuroscience","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008531552,0.0009100218,0.002442261,0.01737361,0.006353945,0.01945559,0.003224476,0.004484481,0.01303449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01582455,0.0004132574,0.0006906896,0.02311966,0.06006158,0.01888689,0.004680892,0.006734117,0.0009068141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02295831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04142727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2706665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.413083,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995921,0.002144095,0.0001905988,0.0003065488,0.001034596,0.0004031803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827543,0.01211236,0.0006207117,0.0005545171,0.003046914,0.0009111954],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005837829,0.00004539699,0.0008971465,0.002976627,0.00005921957,0.0002028562,0.01240663,0.0001059242,0.0001912568,0.8806794,0.02300048,0.07937667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000539451,0.00002934416,0.00553957,0.005782053,0.00005773077,0.0003492635,0.03241,0.000186306,0.00007442763,0.4488914,0.5065693,0.00005668725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002098721,0.8756638,0.001698031,0.07408964,0.001972773,0.000009363101,0.00006238279,0.00002226496,0.04438297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1574156,0.8079076,0.003959425,0.01689466,0.006626252,0.00006704907,0.0001046402,0.00007038634,0.006954343],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2706665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.538182,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1225581758600741,"score_gpt":0.3886715330951615,"score_spread":0.2661133572350874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}