{"id":"W2215116227","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1086","title":"Interventions at the Supreme Court of Canada: Accuracy, Affiliation, and Acceptance","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Intervention (counseling); Law; Psychological intervention; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Parliament; Sociology; Psychology; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01935019,0.0002434567,0.0006614434,0.002143396,0.01029739,0.005297659,0.002548869,0.003064344,0.00585541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1497258,0.0003346622,0.0003417878,0.003087123,0.007605927,0.001783813,0.003825903,0.004212047,0.000571072],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02763432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05127764,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8419357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9090088,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9595462,0.0100064,0.001064929,0.002730634,0.01859733,0.00805453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.874159,0.058174,0.03270457,0.004783536,0.01982073,0.01035812],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006363382,0.0005002792,0.8304864,0.0001995629,0.0002713998,0.0008962748,0.0365588,0.001935434,0.001213546,0.04065264,0.01026883,0.0763806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001281096,0.0002405576,0.9470295,0.0002963897,0.0002426356,0.0001913021,0.01751189,0.002414325,0.001140741,0.006706567,0.02396894,0.000129127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9461091,0.001115009,0.001007922,0.008235273,0.0000706127,0.0002142395,0.0002980747,0.00003131526,0.04291841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966245,0.0001849138,0.0002069714,0.0007148189,0.00003504344,0.00002748289,0.00007391324,0.000004790653,0.002127605],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1580643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3179903,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02787806851561254,"score_gpt":0.2958596795031146,"score_spread":0.2679816109875021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}