{"id":"W2215504162","doi":"10.7202/1034055ar","title":"The Supreme Court in a Pluralistic World: Four Readings of a Reference","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Narrative; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Legal pluralism; Sociology; Notice; Plural; Majority opinion; Legal realism; Legal research; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00548118,0.0008621325,0.0007439091,0.002782818,0.03340712,0.02532704,0.003461109,0.009025929,0.002327685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01030939,0.0005047358,0.0005165671,0.004501887,0.07710594,0.01034182,0.007377832,0.01052175,0.000213091],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07874884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03398992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5747269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5514593,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9873922,0.006680226,0.0002517473,0.001067308,0.003024976,0.001583482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952247,0.002292051,0.0002951848,0.0003432498,0.001241476,0.0006033766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006886986,0.000006688248,0.000180495,0.00001501985,0.000002577207,0.0002011479,0.1176273,0.0001106044,0.00009474715,0.8778908,0.002121302,0.001742455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002121371,0.00004050767,0.00167149,0.0004959401,0.00002351756,0.0002314032,0.2744457,0.001267916,0.0004176888,0.4682908,0.2529888,0.0001049372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1904659,0.01207108,0.01523022,0.09977306,0.0007798561,0.0001143946,0.000147157,0.00009926953,0.6813191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810107,0.0009787524,0.001391304,0.00230464,0.0001096756,0.00003820888,0.00003045691,0.00004542699,0.01409092],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5747269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8555553,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1151990797068008,"score_gpt":0.3292230191740544,"score_spread":0.2140239394672537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}