{"id":"W2215667415","doi":"10.2495/su020151","title":"Frangibility of airport approach lighting towers","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"WIT transactions on the built environment","topic":"Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tower; Finite element method; Structural engineering; Contact force; Engineering; Hazard; Scale model; Joint (building); Simulation; Failure mode and effects analysis; Computer science; Aerospace engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004718708,0.000560486,0.0003867346,0.0009336935,0.0009027894,0.0008762897,0.0005942077,0.0006187187,0.00302818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001574964,0.0002868842,0.0004273788,0.0003559564,0.0007328211,0.0005041927,0.0004691202,0.0003303215,0.0003701295],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000930032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005019517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01644953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03253386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993178,0.00004301128,0.00002197254,0.00008479343,0.0003536925,0.0001787976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994649,0.0001322697,0.00009525942,0.00007107347,0.000173889,0.00006259634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001410656,0.0002090163,0.05472173,0.0003011574,0.00004990014,0.003085361,0.00110464,0.1801176,0.7005845,0.001329021,0.0007527016,0.05633382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001116416,0.003245525,0.2960217,0.0001606178,0.0001099761,0.002648502,0.002529036,0.1822622,0.5042158,0.0008087873,0.007651791,0.0002344739],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953288,0.00004052421,0.002427939,0.000008991011,0.000005549771,0.00002362828,0.0001472762,0.00004640863,0.001970812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979108,0.00003492002,0.0009235279,0.000003634473,8.485366e-7,0.000004184777,0.0001460091,0.000008845429,0.0009671873],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01644953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03270757,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01925837860336689,"score_gpt":0.1733418321783047,"score_spread":0.1540834535749378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}