{"id":"W2216008813","doi":"10.1063/1.3131371","title":"Coherent-State Quantum Process Tomography","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AIP conference proceedings","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Quantum optics; Quantum process; Process (computing); Protocol (science); Quantum state; Quantum; Quantum imaging; Computer science; Direct-conversion receiver; Homodyne detection; Quantum tomography; Physics; Coherent states; Quantum sensor; Set (abstract data type); Quantum mechanics; Quantum information; Statistical physics; Quantum network","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001064343,0.0003152995,0.0004083089,0.0004551364,0.0004142827,0.0007707995,0.0009319374,0.0007648727,0.001838863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003006453,0.0001800828,0.0001828808,0.0006516047,0.001845955,0.001631574,0.001334714,0.001034797,0.0003467522],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006366303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008365685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003583164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005249848,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990748,0.0003205181,0.00002527143,0.0001339529,0.0003584661,0.000086949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989237,0.0005193268,0.0001169214,0.000318866,0.00008650422,0.00003469002],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003561631,0.0002291795,0.002286201,0.000178636,0.00005253868,0.0002878045,0.0003083532,0.03533562,0.1796577,0.7246793,0.001915078,0.05471333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001412199,0.0003423254,0.00180677,0.00004608382,0.00003168203,0.0004695556,0.00009053916,0.4859278,0.2875441,0.2132459,0.01026529,0.00008876502],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1626359,0.0005828337,0.8117105,0.0009979256,0.00007828014,0.0002216532,0.0004869879,0.0004327644,0.02285329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8539652,0.0002472114,0.1425569,0.0001632455,0.00002742017,0.0001557005,0.0001867271,0.00003460474,0.002663019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001838863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006151617,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01531922362268607,"score_gpt":0.2489010252120656,"score_spread":0.2335818015893796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}