{"id":"W2216802450","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0385:aopbws>2.0.co;2","title":"ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL BIAS WITH SNOWSHOE HARE FECAL PELLET-PLOT COUNTS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Pellet; Snowshoe hare; Pellets; Animal science; Population; Biology; Juvenile; Environmental science; Feces; Ecology; Agronomy; Habitat; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003770186,0.00009107686,0.0001520032,0.00006236631,0.0000546929,0.00001445373,0.0001925644,0.00003768864,0.00261744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006534794,0.00007037973,0.00006066509,0.000116485,0.0000766828,0.0001853759,0.00008196049,0.0001245604,0.0001560817],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001300533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001954469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005544313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001230115,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989329,0.00004539378,0.0003212437,0.0001072129,0.0004559786,0.0001372436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994534,0.00001740605,0.0003190813,0.0001273553,0.00002390741,0.00005886001],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001085058,0.0005358094,0.6165558,0.0000358356,0.0002552166,0.0001238858,0.0001023696,0.01790719,0.00006157668,0.0009578495,0.348186,0.01517003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007138424,0.0002308255,0.863499,0.00003846897,0.00009145281,0.00003554911,0.0001054406,0.001325223,0.00001460331,0.00006319565,0.1337851,0.00009728411],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9138867,0.00003173459,0.007238123,0.007769065,0.0003603096,0.0002336054,0.000003832306,0.00001424237,0.07046236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876049,0.00005414499,0.00776235,0.002196423,0.0001376809,0.000002735443,0.00000200886,0.000009106981,0.002230619],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2469433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982943,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01265060974099318,"score_gpt":0.2377868723998379,"score_spread":0.2251362626588447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}