{"id":"W2218600740","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.4.04","title":"The Case for Long Books","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Publication; History; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02014168,0.0004264285,0.0007369112,0.002193879,0.01884729,0.02971062,0.00363593,0.01935063,0.05135676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06459343,0.0008422654,0.0006690341,0.003124006,0.03210361,0.04393044,0.01363739,0.02238213,0.01504617],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01005859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0117746,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007653609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01247241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9715019,0.01127466,0.0009344663,0.002450188,0.01076395,0.003074803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9084089,0.04958502,0.004775093,0.009301293,0.01463671,0.01329312],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002418936,0.00003207398,0.0004410284,0.00008383112,0.000006233885,0.0008447818,0.009756582,0.00004496058,0.00008056579,0.7910283,0.1846242,0.01303327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008133216,0.00001279952,0.0001313672,0.0002937083,0.000003655099,0.0005414288,0.006212688,0.00004612731,0.00009925952,0.07124181,0.9213933,0.00001573194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.009479079,0.01328385,0.003909021,0.4602048,0.006000852,0.00004729842,0.000106731,0.0001478373,0.5068206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2240765,0.01023415,0.004314515,0.2109098,0.01187223,0.0003004364,0.0002091905,0.0008573677,0.5372257],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9702893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1718055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1410129675444254,"score_gpt":0.2696137709571317,"score_spread":0.1286008034127062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}