{"id":"W2218600740","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.4.04","title":"The Case for Long Books","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Publication; History; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005124955,0.0001244566,0.000183949,0.0001472614,0.001023042,0.1580247,0.0007337055,0.00006133792,0.00006187813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004160238,0.00007675447,0.0001990777,0.00003387254,0.0001461447,0.09133312,0.00009432634,0.0009518788,0.000008760016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001095607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002039457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006965493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007853992,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984308,0.0000691227,0.0005759814,0.0001000943,0.0005207966,0.0003032459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952019,0.0004132127,0.0004780896,0.0001818574,0.0034455,0.0002794068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001166561,0.00004117552,0.0002565369,0.0000142589,0.00009017777,0.0007284796,0.01280236,0.000002839591,0.000001892914,0.7039292,0.2566045,0.02541189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000707085,0.0002713141,0.00002444642,0.0000430715,0.00003390161,0.001418128,0.02573998,0.00001308966,0.000009324237,0.03936578,0.9322576,0.0001162749],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4293562,0.005725517,0.0002039651,0.01481915,0.006521831,0.000313192,0.00004370045,0.00005630257,0.5429602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9603899,0.000009924682,0.000140238,0.001005311,0.003995463,0.000005538764,0.000002547429,0.00002784029,0.03442326],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6756531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9213759,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1410129675444254,"score_gpt":0.2696137709571317,"score_spread":0.1286008034127062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}