{"id":"W2218901870","doi":"10.1139/t2012-036","title":"Discussion of “A new theoretical method to evaluate the internal stability of granular soils” <sup>1</sup>Appears in the Canadian Geotechnical Journal, <b>49</b>(1): 45–58 [doi: 10.1139/t11-083].","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geotechnical engineering; Soil water; Relative density; Void (composites); Mathematics; Clay soil; Void ratio; Geology; Geometry; Soil science; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007104586,0.0005558726,0.0008200288,0.0007855443,0.0004373825,0.0002319372,0.002185603,0.0007335612,0.001144501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001691621,0.0003139052,0.0005573893,0.001048177,0.0005048967,0.000270837,0.0001311734,0.004360809,0.00002850333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001219308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001369422,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05983844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04115531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943685,0.0007488833,0.001527768,0.0003471401,0.001161379,0.001846349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950002,0.0005123506,0.0001468431,0.0009976411,0.0002323514,0.003110603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001033796,0.00007989087,0.00028721,0.00006819874,0.0001460964,0.0001147074,0.001438833,0.9460144,0.0007748445,0.01096569,0.01469867,0.02530809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004082896,0.001457056,0.03578423,0.001462865,0.0008191327,0.009826214,0.003285031,0.5292087,0.002600305,0.08821207,0.3202478,0.003013669],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4521606,0.00489223,0.4653327,0.06708314,0.002296218,0.003176903,0.0003197864,0.0004340564,0.004304371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964173,0.00006733182,0.002356676,0.0005017187,0.0005078414,0.00001611066,0.00000581219,0.00008003508,0.00004713948],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5442567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01445777550373874,"score_gpt":0.2532002162813681,"score_spread":0.2387424407776294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}