{"id":"W2218901870","doi":"10.1139/t2012-036","title":"Discussion of “A new theoretical method to evaluate the internal stability of granular soils” <sup>1</sup>Appears in the Canadian Geotechnical Journal, <b>49</b>(1): 45–58 [doi: 10.1139/t11-083].","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geotechnical engineering; Soil water; Relative density; Void (composites); Mathematics; Clay soil; Void ratio; Geology; Geometry; Soil science; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006936003,0.0009912796,0.0005998614,0.001900028,0.001582007,0.002103039,0.003423371,0.003487252,0.01120651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01194522,0.000447991,0.002107187,0.00119805,0.006735961,0.003264677,0.001691583,0.003406652,0.002218914],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002017664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001333679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00391946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003604255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973453,0.000942482,0.0001452458,0.0002352334,0.001228702,0.0001030025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963635,0.001983552,0.0001894368,0.0004136137,0.0009554015,0.00009452938],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005788374,0.0000717933,0.001489465,0.0003592015,0.00009421001,0.000312587,0.0003780279,0.0308346,0.006365274,0.8688981,0.04553444,0.04560446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003081486,0.0001742745,0.001478791,0.0001942475,0.00007074288,0.0007758834,0.0004276778,0.25148,0.01819055,0.5797775,0.1471921,0.0002073803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.004122777,0.001470887,0.9566121,0.01627661,0.007358212,0.00009185025,0.0001332481,0.0003394891,0.01359485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2566684,0.005565889,0.6663166,0.01582752,0.006588565,0.0007677236,0.0003865809,0.0009524344,0.04692629],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01120651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03748947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01445777550373874,"score_gpt":0.2532002162813681,"score_spread":0.2387424407776294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}