{"id":"W2219941528","doi":"10.1007/s11676-015-0198-6","title":"Performance evaluation of forest co-management: a case study of Chunati Wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry Research","topic":"Strategic Planning and Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Commonwealth Scholarship Commission; McGill University","keywords":"Livelihood; Transparency (behavior); SWOT analysis; Accountability; Business; Wildlife; Wildlife management; Analytic hierarchy process; Environmental resource management; Forest management; Corporate governance; Focus group; Politics; Environmental planning; Geography; Political science; Marketing; Forestry; Engineering; Ecology; Economics; Agriculture","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001296794,0.0003743441,0.0002586951,0.001389692,0.003351815,0.001509655,0.0008827455,0.0007762194,0.002964094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002113936,0.0001411223,0.0002070171,0.002028544,0.0009513842,0.0009336459,0.0009978157,0.0005425439,0.0003304011],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005915366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002798665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09499745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2692035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988972,0.0003660604,0.00004735338,0.0001068813,0.0002272238,0.0003552008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982359,0.0005223522,0.0002756359,0.00008302637,0.0004555116,0.0004274959],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001127252,0.003255195,0.6953427,0.0005465728,0.0002304711,0.02652695,0.0572511,0.02146536,0.01694947,0.007198391,0.004194456,0.1659122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005031694,0.003081606,0.6539328,0.000238172,0.0001812069,0.003652009,0.2883691,0.02596223,0.00602281,0.001448972,0.01692367,0.0001372336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945806,0.00004845358,0.0001747597,0.0001048981,0.000002158543,0.00003402743,0.00005189365,0.000005444741,0.004997837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979398,0.00007169966,0.0003317851,0.00001001977,0.000001485419,0.000006460524,0.00003840643,0.000003055352,0.001597282],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09499745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.188889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2342643126618619,"score_gpt":0.4098881342991283,"score_spread":0.1756238216372664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}