{"id":"W2219941528","doi":"10.1007/s11676-015-0198-6","title":"Performance evaluation of forest co-management: a case study of Chunati Wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry Research","topic":"Strategic Planning and Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Commonwealth Scholarship Commission; McGill University","keywords":"Livelihood; Transparency (behavior); SWOT analysis; Accountability; Business; Wildlife; Wildlife management; Analytic hierarchy process; Environmental resource management; Forest management; Corporate governance; Focus group; Politics; Environmental planning; Geography; Political science; Marketing; Forestry; Engineering; Ecology; Economics; Agriculture","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008313602,0.0001256368,0.000356267,0.001142683,0.0001285867,0.00009275445,0.0005230272,0.00005825332,0.00005410887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005618798,0.00009909498,0.0001017285,0.001245,0.0001099951,0.0007945774,0.0001499439,0.0003505847,0.00001166795],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006665914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001738194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005642774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009325281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959822,0.0001217296,0.0007167935,0.0001534026,0.002747918,0.0002779406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996183,0.00009591974,0.0007003706,0.0003407876,0.002633797,0.00004613113],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003350324,0.0009102104,0.962233,0.0003349929,0.0004184082,0.0009763532,0.0007406013,0.01536489,0.00003164281,0.0002179378,0.01203809,0.006398856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01740004,0.002480364,0.5673752,0.001284299,0.002028085,0.001119561,0.1505504,0.2493167,0.0001558857,0.005069807,0.002605884,0.0006137065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9824274,0.0001166995,0.000007865495,0.0001041128,0.00009520535,0.0002795602,0.000001405349,0.000006221991,0.01696154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999341,0.0000142318,0.00005143356,0.00001738488,0.0004718102,0.000008025155,0.000005491265,0.00001339167,0.00007730781],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3948577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4040976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2342643126618619,"score_gpt":0.4098881342991283,"score_spread":0.1756238216372664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}