{"id":"W2220054153","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12598","title":"Quantifying relative fish abundance with <scp>eDNA</scp>: a promising tool for fisheries management","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":340,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Catch per unit effort; Abundance (ecology); Fishery; Environmental science; Relative species abundance; Environmental DNA; Biomass (ecology); Trout; Ecology; Spatial ecology; Spatial distribution; Biology; Biodiversity; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00210403,0.0004538089,0.000375587,0.001867543,0.0001236977,0.0005838441,0.0004022643,0.0003954772,0.002785078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003124278,0.0001671834,0.0001588113,0.001227918,0.0004385016,0.0007052486,0.000391835,0.000237114,0.0004534698],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004571727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004286747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002301468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004147809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994261,0.0002341518,0.00005682264,0.0001262965,0.0001451308,0.00001152432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979108,0.0007491056,0.0007713605,0.00009652077,0.0003941622,0.00007806492],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006896942,0.00009705732,0.4566686,0.002215065,0.0003106059,0.00007811764,0.0001390759,0.004071036,0.08911656,0.001391695,0.002267021,0.4429556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004920968,0.001476965,0.9076243,0.0008508088,0.0003293462,0.0003639194,0.0008193069,0.01952202,0.04522724,0.005321457,0.0182939,0.0001215476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7733681,0.02179665,0.178192,0.002459328,0.0002449339,0.0003102116,0.01094639,0.0006876184,0.01199476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.917247,0.003426897,0.07439414,0.0004250457,0.0001117749,0.0002021199,0.001363444,0.00002786355,0.002801774],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002785078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01112729,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02886702329648378,"score_gpt":0.2277814525993959,"score_spread":0.1989144293029121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}