{"id":"W2220054153","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12598","title":"Quantifying relative fish abundance with <scp>eDNA</scp>: a promising tool for fisheries management","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":340,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Catch per unit effort; Abundance (ecology); Fishery; Environmental science; Relative species abundance; Environmental DNA; Biomass (ecology); Trout; Ecology; Spatial ecology; Spatial distribution; Biology; Biodiversity; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004394664,0.0001658432,0.0002959283,0.00004824153,0.0002162501,0.00002917049,0.0002562955,0.00007554857,0.00004158775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004922019,0.0001386454,0.00006193242,0.0001140086,0.0003774264,0.0003074169,0.0002539015,0.0001729099,0.00006161215],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004931234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007845443,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002885924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006624926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988157,0.0000227818,0.0003072073,0.0002344775,0.0002982701,0.0003215437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991575,0.0001785419,0.0004267901,0.000125222,0.00001548098,0.00009645388],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000480881,0.0003258907,0.9179294,0.00006802261,0.0005581892,0.00008025637,0.006770267,0.004299158,0.0009344174,0.000761644,0.06576588,0.002026022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00386036,0.002235372,0.8929552,0.00003746006,0.0002303972,0.00007757021,0.009848085,0.0000594585,0.002509418,0.003025678,0.08494369,0.0002173521],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867179,0.00001973765,0.001082774,0.0003614672,0.0001694254,0.0005125565,0.000008480164,0.00001418124,0.01111347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9009213,0.00004333232,0.09787177,0.0005278035,0.00005217892,0.00003334694,0.000002369331,0.00001741613,0.0005305329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09678899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5653797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02886702329648378,"score_gpt":0.2277814525993959,"score_spread":0.1989144293029121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}