{"id":"W2220167018","doi":"10.1111/jep.12509","title":"A ‘reluctant’ critical review: ‘Manual for evidence‐based clinical practice (2015)’","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Critical appraisal; Evidence-based medicine; Objectivity (philosophy); Psychology; Alternative medicine; Medicine; Population; Psychological intervention; Clinical Practice; Health care; Systematic review; MEDLINE; Medical education; Family medicine; Nursing; Epistemology; Pathology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2919183,0.004433111,0.005497382,0.02391693,0.005692737,0.01468349,0.01256939,0.01153129,0.04226827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6139799,0.005287538,0.006864217,0.01655446,0.01401011,0.01363971,0.01269993,0.02225189,0.04103808],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01334453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05808733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002955489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004461125,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5761788,0.2609814,0.09105655,0.01027922,0.05915031,0.002353732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2152206,0.4682081,0.0415136,0.04683225,0.222854,0.00537134],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000131655,0.00006269832,0.00007857849,0.02047561,0.0001190836,0.0001834262,0.003489107,0.0003075501,0.0008280529,0.01309303,0.8365428,0.1246884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003624996,0.0001682421,0.0007317907,0.05154448,0.0001221056,0.0007712884,0.001114674,0.001054871,0.0005386515,0.03418189,0.9091108,0.0002988176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001336966,0.04694257,0.3323146,0.213551,0.1486673,0.193894,0.01077225,0.009774073,0.04274712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006535402,0.01620251,0.7037789,0.04583404,0.01499548,0.1909074,0.003597959,0.001315095,0.01683332],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7080817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8731908,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8290798736231626,"score_gpt":0.7870278336578572,"score_spread":0.04205203996530538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}