{"id":"W2220510324","doi":"10.17269/cjph.106.5031","title":"Public perceptions and scientific evidence for perceived harms/risks of community water fluoridation: An examination of online comments pertaining to fluoridation cessation in Calgary in 2011","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Public Health","topic":"Fluoride Effects and Removal","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health; Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Calgary; Alberta Innovates; Public Health Agency; Public Health Agency of Canada","keywords":"Water fluoridation; Scientific evidence; Relevance (law); Scientific literature; Risk perception; Scientific consensus; Psychology; Environmental health; The Internet; Medicine; Perception; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01421573,0.0002092,0.0008444761,0.00138482,0.0002988841,0.0001321511,0.0005060994,0.0001713273,0.0001815945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009683462,0.000166853,0.00008570139,0.000621115,0.0002535627,0.001304456,0.00006809456,0.0005427392,0.000003907164],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00242722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002739752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03770239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1820177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954969,0.00205547,0.001306504,0.0002295561,0.0004192789,0.0004923428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973875,0.0002608226,0.0006918428,0.0003160572,0.0003006926,0.001043044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003729824,0.0001169172,0.003104186,0.001198809,0.000009896446,0.000001534397,0.01171007,0.00004565436,0.00003750838,0.00001864942,0.0004179005,0.9833351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001823308,0.002424856,0.7746878,0.009064751,0.0001195362,0.0001145337,0.008978379,0.002631874,0.000005215325,0.0001489597,0.1992668,0.0007340693],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.902884,0.09175701,0.0004227881,0.002582807,0.0005348648,0.001632432,0.000146766,0.000004422433,0.00003491784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8858139,0.1098516,0.002464686,0.0001740762,0.0001547354,0.00004566914,0.001353485,0.00005011737,0.00009173566],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.982601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9687057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4463559562697765,"score_gpt":0.4304197889725979,"score_spread":0.01593616729717856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}