{"id":"W2220566425","doi":"10.1103/physrevc.93.015204","title":"Evaluation of the strength of electron-proton scattering data for determining the proton charge radius","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical review. C","topic":"Atomic and Molecular Physics","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Charge radius; Physics; Proton; Atomic physics; Scattering; RADIUS; Classical electron radius; Charge (physics); Form factor (electronics); Elastic scattering; Dipole; Hydrogen atom; Electron; Parametrization (atmospheric modeling); Nuclear physics; Particle physics; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004955147,0.001190841,0.000581625,0.001695007,0.0005045889,0.0008613819,0.001360065,0.0006734344,0.001448667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008873783,0.0006829902,0.0008228504,0.001242662,0.0005739385,0.001093532,0.001081593,0.0008497782,0.0005543824],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007202492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004425448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001990029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004648469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982161,0.0006789301,0.0001301991,0.0002195553,0.0006171159,0.0001381526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996188,0.001702767,0.0003651161,0.0009792196,0.0006714121,0.00009344005],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001394225,0.0002042676,0.1182918,0.0004607462,0.0006790024,0.001248287,0.0005407695,0.1271529,0.6485842,0.02883538,0.001346272,0.07126208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006222173,0.0003187413,0.04675963,0.00007869353,0.0002420979,0.0007485301,0.0002819438,0.4421157,0.4999219,0.006363699,0.00293241,0.0001743717],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8967087,0.0007070784,0.09445506,0.0002914544,0.00003211308,0.0000536781,0.0005094177,0.0005173865,0.006725154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816861,0.0003530547,0.01687587,0.00005716629,0.00000721275,0.00002747948,0.0004635777,0.0000961601,0.0004333796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004955147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0262056,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05501265595847397,"score_gpt":0.3820561358075371,"score_spread":0.3270434798490631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}