{"id":"W22206531","doi":"10.1021/es00011a019","title":"Evaluating the usefulness of citizen science for natural resource management in marine environments","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Environmental Science & Technology","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Brock University; Griffith University; NSW Department of Primary Industries; Australian Geographic Society; University of Technology Sydney; University of Cambridge; Earthwatch Institute","keywords":"Citizen science; Seagrass; Natural resource management; Environmental resource management; Natural resource; Sustainability; Adaptive management; Resource (disambiguation); Natural (archaeology); Public participation; Environmental planning; Ecosystem management; Work (physics); Geography; Habitat; Ecology; Engineering; Political science; Environmental science; Computer science; Public relations; Ecosystem","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1819085,0.0004847137,0.0007296139,0.005135292,0.003911776,0.008824879,0.001326032,0.002130575,0.003058763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.260617,0.000481372,0.001093818,0.00507652,0.006151225,0.00917699,0.008397267,0.002322654,0.0006094731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005978791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01088643,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005947034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009002782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.792464,0.1681691,0.007178529,0.003031129,0.0260339,0.003123351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.586851,0.3133124,0.0256911,0.0181981,0.04951323,0.006434128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001520295,0.002331633,0.4665667,0.003853538,0.0003917929,0.0004069077,0.09543116,0.004718112,0.00225553,0.01827514,0.004790894,0.3994583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003722461,0.01427004,0.5369947,0.009470228,0.0006136125,0.0005161797,0.2828434,0.02095674,0.005379455,0.03130775,0.09685814,0.0004174334],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9040453,0.001423768,0.01281146,0.01317818,0.0001409652,0.004390395,0.000576593,0.00007195664,0.0633614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691367,0.0008417543,0.0265085,0.0007610871,0.00004453334,0.001640943,0.0001760884,0.0000204651,0.0008699603],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8180915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9620354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02426353315834274,"score_gpt":0.2929111743398671,"score_spread":0.2686476411815244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}