{"id":"W2221679987","doi":"","title":"Assessing Risk of Bias and Confounding in Observational Studies of Interventions or Exposures: Further Development of the RTI Item Bank","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Europe PMC (PubMed Central)","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":199,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Observational study; Confounding; Psychological intervention; Critical appraisal; Causality (physics); CLARITY; Information bias; Psychology; Causal inference; Medicine; Selection bias; Psychiatry; Alternative medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009114395,0.0001225723,0.0006503243,0.0001854284,0.00008281463,0.00003720457,0.0002042068,0.00004503458,0.0001245348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01161593,0.0001047642,0.0000893789,0.0002887537,0.0001375592,0.0004246815,0.0001014877,0.00010941,0.00001351956],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001950987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001751147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002066928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002403933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951814,0.0005249035,0.00364222,0.0002438388,0.0001013862,0.0003062567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950201,0.001566964,0.002932385,0.0002562819,0.0001532911,0.00007096462],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006436178,0.00008092195,0.9751074,0.0006769665,0.000135563,1.132093e-7,0.0190182,0.00006694869,0.00002090245,0.003466002,0.0002999079,0.001120601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004594107,0.00001599086,0.992042,0.0005479167,0.000009481892,6.429382e-7,0.004413432,0.0001743937,0.0001422972,0.0007443772,0.001349921,0.0001001579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940494,0.002398761,0.0003651858,0.001792094,0.0003794494,0.0006853375,0.00003832946,0.000006923725,0.0002844786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956763,0.0003256266,0.003436405,0.0001841145,0.00004000744,0.00008406037,0.000003552926,0.00001633185,0.0002335374],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01693454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967096,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6343931812846916,"score_gpt":0.4396426598555497,"score_spread":0.1947505214291418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}