{"id":"W2223252633","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2015.04.239","title":"Process Evaluation of the Smarter Lunchrooms RCT: Unique Application of the RE-AIM Framework","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","topic":"Behavioral and Psychological Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Operationalization; Protocol (science); Fidelity; Preparedness; Randomized controlled trial; Process (computing); Cafeteria; Process management; Program evaluation; Medical education; Psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering; Nursing; Alternative medicine; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007909109,0.00008517005,0.0001638567,0.0000545227,0.0000711316,0.000009576192,0.0001964259,0.0001334928,0.0001334025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000091246,0.00004616097,0.0000978038,0.0003045625,0.0001452657,0.00008141097,0.00001757054,0.0002344341,0.000002241506],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005160926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001061405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002828566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009994992,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986306,0.0002774954,0.0004657789,0.0001077277,0.0004388054,0.00007954014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977429,0.00004106923,0.0007229105,0.0002101394,0.001226337,0.00005662656],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000218297,0.03021529,0.6605775,0.0001274384,0.00006559325,4.33933e-7,0.01324834,0.000008771969,0.003701007,0.002630016,0.01740561,0.2718017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007807343,0.0002071921,0.9791415,0.0001603404,0.0003962115,0.00004386824,0.007127005,0.000003364207,0.0009552647,0.008137761,0.002977483,0.00006923601],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926559,0.001032079,0.0001353845,0.00346598,0.001592285,0.0006088792,0.000007743995,0.000003806254,0.0004979913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990156,0.00002559248,0.0001889246,0.0002051348,0.0002327048,0.0002350847,0.000002369235,0.000005592701,0.00008894597],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3185641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.188239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1849867853593897,"score_gpt":0.4341324641370969,"score_spread":0.2491456787777072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}