{"id":"W2223342493","doi":"10.1002/acp.3200","title":"Safety in Numbers: A Policy‐Capturing Study of the Alibi Assessment Process","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Ontario Tech University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Alibi; Suspect; Psychology; Social psychology; Law enforcement; Criminology; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02331828,0.0002580984,0.0003442299,0.002557249,0.002752339,0.003943766,0.001190281,0.0009977017,0.002126286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1382246,0.0005118182,0.0003309377,0.001801618,0.002240323,0.004166367,0.002644241,0.001730068,0.0003967332],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003615455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003861179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005264497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005448309,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9849477,0.01105739,0.0009530311,0.0006814089,0.00179503,0.0005654069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8119676,0.1398959,0.02582127,0.01007034,0.01086219,0.001382768],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001348802,0.002611053,0.4477057,0.0006106239,0.00008973479,0.0005606051,0.3811312,0.001500062,0.005998665,0.01882411,0.001763191,0.1378562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001438773,0.002067789,0.6331053,0.0007595249,0.0001284831,0.0007507058,0.2978007,0.01871027,0.01108812,0.01145187,0.02374549,0.0002477419],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930648,0.000058185,0.003318828,0.0002148248,0.00000640638,0.0003047516,0.00007949231,0.00001856584,0.002934287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949507,0.00008092909,0.003854677,0.000122523,0.000008119832,0.0002852973,0.0001113761,0.00001263613,0.0005737747],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02331828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1233203,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02766313912295344,"score_gpt":0.4045718641569405,"score_spread":0.376908725033987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}